ESG Data
ESG Data
The following is the ESG (Environment, Social, Governance) performance data of the Group.
ESG Data(PDF format, 441kBytes)
Environment
We provide the data of environmental management, reduction of environmental load by products and services, greenhouse gas (GHG), air/chemicals, energy, water/recycling, green purchasing and water.
| Category/Item | Scope | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOGISTEED | Japan group |
Overseas group |
||||||
| Environmental Management | ||||||||
| Coverage rate of the environment management system (ISO14001 or equivalent environment management system certification) |
● | ● | ● | 45.2% | 44.1% | 47.0% | 52.9% | 53.2% |
| Japan | ● | ● | Head office acquired "Eco Stage 2" (equivalent to ISO14001) and implemented it in Japan group companies. | |||||
| Overseas | ● | 4.0% | 4.4% | 9.3% | 12.6% | 12.5% | ||
| Number of non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations (environmental compliance) | ● | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Attendance rate of environmental e-learning courses*1 | ● | ● | ● | 99.0% | 87.3% | 89.0% | 88.4%★ | 91.6% |
| Greenhouse Gas (GHG) | ||||||||
| Total GHG emissions (Scope 1) (t-CO2) | ● | ● | ● | 187,791 | 214,858 | 241,044 | 262,523 | 272,525 |
| Japan | ● | ● | 40,519 | 40,641 | 41,267 | 50,568 | 58,684 | |
| Overseas | ● | 147,272 | 174,217 | 199,777 | 211,955 | 213,841 | ||
| Total GHG emissions (Scope 1&2) (t-CO2) | ● | ● | ● | 278,297 | 297,175 | 315,509 | 337,507 | 365,801 |
| Japan | ● | ● | 110,616 | 103,957 | 97,091 | 100,360 | 124,383 | |
| Overseas | ● | 167,681 | 193,218 | 218,418 | 237,147 | 241,418 | ||
| Total GHG emissions (Scope 3) (t-CO2) | ● | ● | ● | 513,312 | 590,518 | 512,363 | 560,260★ | 2,164,845 |
| Japan | ● | ● | 513,312 | 590,518 | 512,363 | 560,260★ | 1,104,732※2 | |
| Overseas | ● | - | - | - | - | 1,060,113 | ||
| Air/Chemicals | ||||||||
| NOx（t） | ● | ● | - | - | - | - | 29.7 | |
| SOx（t） | ● | ● | - | - | - | - | 0.1 | |
| PM（t） | ● | ● | - | - | - | - | 1.2 | |
| Energy | ||||||||
| Total energy input/consumption (amount used) (GJ) | ● | ● | 2,218,798 | 2,106,281 | 1,898,092 | 1,955,152★ | 2,321,103 | |
| Waste/Recycling | ||||||||
| Total waste emissions (t) | ● | ● | 32,245 | 32,232 | 32,286 | 32,744★ | 37,426 | |
| Copy paper consumption | ● | ● | YoY:-4.7% | YoY:-5.9% | YoY:+4.4％ | YoY:+11.4％★ | YoY:+23.7％ | |
| Recycling rate*3 | ● | ● | 99% | 99% | 99% | 99%★ | 99% | |
| Amount of non-recycled waste (t) | ● | ● | 278 | 288 | 338 | 382★ | 285 | |
| Amount of recycled waste (recycled amount: total) (t) | ● | ● | 31,928 | 31,911 | 31,900 | 32,363★ | 36,989 | |
| Emissions of hazardous waste (total volume) (t) | ● | ● | Although we do not keep track of the exact amount of PCB, other waste oil and polluted mud because their amount is low, we manage them properly in accordance with laws. | |||||
| Green Purchasing | ||||||||
| Green purchasing rate*4 | ● | ● | 82.0% | 79.4% | 78.6% | 79.3%★ | 78.3%★ | |
| Water | ||||||||
| Input of water resources (m3) | ● | ● | 295,018 | 296,229 | 303,338 | 289,179★ | 318,365 | |
| Unit per floor space (m3/m2) | ● | ● | 0.077 | 0.076 | 0.076 | 0.070★ | 0.067 | |
- *1Includes overseas group companies from FY2025
- *2Expanded the calculation scope and reviewed calculation methodologies from FY2025
- *3Recycling rate for packaging materials
- *4Purchase rate of eco-friendly products among office supplies purchased via the electronic purchasing system
- ★Figures do not include the ALPS LOGISTICS Group
- Environmental Policy and Action Plan
- Environmental Management
- Climate Change and TCFD-Aligned Reporting
- Waste and Resource Circulation
- Natural Capital (Pollution Prevention, Water Resources, Biodiversity)
- Reducing Environmental Impact Across the Entire Supply Chain
Social
We provide the data of employee basic data, diversity, job creation, work-life balance, occupational health and safety, social contribution.
| Category/Item | Scope | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOGISTEED | Japan group |
Overseas group |
||||||
| Employee Basic Data | ||||||||
| Number of employees (excluding senior employees, part-time or temporary employees) | ● | 1,224 | 1,199 | 891 | 881 | 898 | ||
| Male | ● | 963 | 920 | 671 | 671 | 673 | ||
| Female | ● | 261 | 279 | 220 | 210 | 225 | ||
| Total personnel*1 (Senior employees, part-time or temporary employees) | ● | ● | ● | 45,681 （22,763） |
46,755 （22,743） |
46,916 （22,715） |
56,227 （26,800） |
56,240 （26,998） |
| Japan | ● | ● | 29,868 | 29,561 | 28,615 | 34,564 | 34,708 | |
| Overseas | ● | 15,813 | 17,194 | 18,301 | 21,663 | 21,532 | ||
| Average age (full-time employees) (years old) | ● | 42.9 | 43.2 | 42.6 | 42.6 | 42.7 | ||
| Average service years (full-time employees) (years) | ● | 20.0 | 20.1 | 19.4 | 19.3 | 19.3 | ||
| Employee turnover (number of employees) (Full-time employees only, excludes retirees, and employees transferring to group companies) | ● | 41 | 59 | 67 (Including second career support system: 290) |
47 | 42 | ||
| Turnover rate (full-time employees only, No. of employees left ÷ No. of employees at the beginning of FY x 100) | ● | 2.1% | 3.1% | 3.7% (Including second career support system: 15.9%) |
3.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Voluntary Turnover Rate (full-time employees only, No. of employees voluntary left ÷ No. of employees at the beginning of FY x 100) | ● | 2.1% | 2.9% | 3.6% | 2.9% | 2.7% | ||
| Diversity | ||||||||
| Ratio of female new graduates hired (non-consolidated) | ● | ● | Joined on April 1, 2022: 40.5％ (36.8%) |
Joined on April 1, 2023: 40.4％ (24.3%) |
Joined on April 1, 2024: 36.9% (20.0%) |
Joined on April 1, 2025: 42.3％ (28.6%)★ |
Joined on April 1, 2026: 48.4％ (45.8%) |
|
| Numbers of female managers (persons) | ● | 41 | 52 | 51 | 47 | 53 | ||
| Ratio of female managers | ● | 5.5% | 6.9% | 7.3% | 6.9% | 7.9% | ||
| Number of female assistant managers (persons) | ● | 77 | 83 | 77 | 84 | 92 | ||
| Ratio of female assistant managers | ● | 14.3% | 15.8% | 17.5% | 20.6% | 23.4% | ||
| Gender Pay Ratio (Average annual salary of women ÷ Average annual salary of men) | ● | - | 75.6% | 76.5% | 75.5% | 75.9% | ||
| Number of foreign employees (persons) | ● | 40 | 39 | 34 | 37 | 44 | ||
| Ratio of foreign employees | ● | 2.2% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 2.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Number of foreign managers (persons) | ● | 3 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 10 | ||
| Ratio of persons with disabilities hired (as of June each year) | ● | ● | 2.65% | 2.84% | 2.92% | 3.07%★ | 2.83%★ | |
| Ratio of re-employment of the elderly (only those who requested) | ● | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | ||
| Job Creation | ||||||||
| Number of new graduates hired (Members of the Track and Field Club) (persons) | ● | Joined on April 1, 2022: 38（0） | Joined on April 1, 2023: 42（5） | Joined on April 1, 2024: 38（3） | Joined on April 1, 2025: 53（4） | Joined on April 1, 2026: 52（4） | ||
| Number of female new graduates hired (persons) | ● | 14 | 9 | 7 | 14 | 22 | ||
| Number of new graduates hired who remained for three years (excluding those in the Track and Field Club) (persons) | ● | Joined on April 1, 2019: 23 Remained as of April 1, 2022: 20 |
Joined on April 1, 2020: 25 Remained as of April 1, 2023: 19 |
Joined on April 1, 2021: 32 Remained as of April 1, 2024: 29 |
Joined on April 1, 2022: 38 Remained as of April 1, 2025: 35 |
Joined on April 1, 2023: 37 Remained as of April 1, 2026: 35 |
||
| Retention rate of new graduates hired after three years | ● | 87.0% | 76.0% | 90.6% | 92.1% | 94.6% | ||
| Number of experienced workers hired (persons) | ● | 17 | 22 | 19 | 26 | 16 | ||
| Number of female experienced workers hired (persons) | ● | 10 | 11 | 6 | 10 | 6 | ||
| Ratio of experienced workers hired | ● | 35% | 37% | 34% | 43% | 25% | ||
| Work-life Balance | ||||||||
| Number of those who took maternity leave (persons) | ● | 18 | 10 | 12 | 9 | 10 | ||
| Number of those who took childcare leave (persons) | ● | 27 | 30 | 36 | 23 | 23 | ||
| Number of male employees (persons) | ● | 6 | 21 | 23 | 14 | 15 | ||
| Ratio of those who returned to work after childcare leave | ● | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | ||
| Number of those who took nursing care leave (persons) |
● | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | ||
| Number of paid leave taken (non-consolidated) (days) | ● | ● | 15.7（16.9） | 15.9（16.8） | 15.3（16.7） | 16.6（16.7）★ | 14.4（16.1）★ | |
| Rate of paid leave taken (non-consolidated) | ● | ● | 67.9％（70.7％） | 68.8％（70.6％） | 67.4％（68.5％） | 68.3％（70.2％）★ | 59.9％（69.7％）★ | |
| Overtime hours (average of full-time employees excluding managers) (hours/month) |
● | 27.5 | 27.3 | 27.5 | 28.6 | 28.4 | ||
| Occupational Health and Safety | ||||||||
| Frequency rate of workplace accidents (non-consolidated) |
● | ● | 0.88（0） | 0.62（0） | 0.80（0） | 0.44（0）★ | 0.80（0） | |
| Severity rate of workplace accidents (nonconsolidated) | ● | ● | 0.017（0） | 0.009（0） | 0.161（0） | 0.018（0）★ | 0.167（0） | |
| Number of traffic accidents defined in Article 2 of the Transportation Safety Management Regulation (incidents)*2 | ● | ● | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
| Social Contribution | ||||||||
| Total expenditure for social contribution (millions of yen)*3 |
● | ● | ● | 87.1 | 87.9 | 65.5 | 76.9 | 74.7 |
- *1Excludes associates accounted for using the equity method
- *2Scope of application for Japan group companies (12 in total) includes LOGISTEED East Japan, LOGISTEED Central Japan, LOGISTEED West Japan, LOGISTEED Kyusyu, LOGISTEED North Japan, VANTEC, VANTEC EAST LOGISTICS, VANTEC CENTRAL LOGISTICS, VANTEC KYUSHU LOGISTICS, TOKIWA KAIUN, ALPS LOGISTICS, Ryutsu Service
- *3Includes donations and matching gifts, etc.
- ★Figures do not include the ALPS LOGISTICS Group
- Respect for Human Rights
- Human Resource Management
- DE&I・Work-Life Balance
- Occupational Health and Safety / Health and Productivity Management
- Contribution to Customers
- Supply Chain
- Social Contribution Activities
Governance
We provide the data of corporate governance, compliance, risk management, information security and intellectual properties.
| Category/Item | Scope | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOGISTEED | Japan group |
Overseas group |
||||||
| Corporate Governance | ||||||||
| Number of directors (female) (persons)*1 | ● | 9（2） | 8（2） | 8（1） | 8（1） | 7（1） | ||
| Non-Executive Director | ● | 7（2） | 6（2） | 7（1） | 7（1） | 6（1） | ||
| Number of executive officers (female) (persons)*2 | ● | 19（0） | 20（1） | 22（1） | 25（0） | 26（0） | ||
| Compliance | ||||||||
| Number of compliance training conducted*3 | ● | ● | ● | 19（2） | 27（3） | 23（3） | 23（3）★ | 22（4） |
| Number of compliance meeting held | ● | ● | ● | 7 | 13 | 5 | 7★ | 9 |
| Attendance rate for the Code of Conduct e-learning (Number of attendees) | ● | ● | ● | - (51,364 attendees in total) |
97% (86,535 attendees in total) |
98.5% (81,955 attendees in total) |
98.8％ (71,430 attendees in total) |
96.0％ (75,056 attendees in total) |
| Attendance rate of implementing e-learning for procurement personnel |
● | ● | ● | - | 100％ （6,872 eligible participants） |
100％ （6,982 eligible participants） |
100％ （6,481 eligible participants） |
100％ （6,531 eligible participants） |
| Number of whistle-blowing reports/consultations (cases) | ● | ● | ● | 67 | 50 | 78 | 59★ | 105 |
| Risk Management | ||||||||
| Areas which conducted BCP simulation training and number of attendees | ● | ● | Various locations approx. 200*4 |
BCP training by Disaster Response HQ Approx. 70*5 Initial response trainings 40 (3)*5 KYT (fire-specific danger prediction training) Approx. 150 (18)*5 |
BCP training by Disaster Response HQ Approx. 42*6 Initial response training by group company head office Disaster Response HQs 225 (13)*7 |
BCP training by Disaster Response HQ Approx. 55*6 Initial response training by group company head office Disaster Response HQs 231 (13)*7 |
BCP training by Disaster Response HQ Approx. 60*8 Initial response training by group company head office Disaster Response HQs 158 (13)*7 |
Overseas sites which conducted BCP Caravan and number of attendees |
● | -*9 | India area 23 | Group companies in Asia: 6*10 | Group companies in China/Asia: 7 (270 employees)*11 |
Group companies in China/Asia: 6 (267 employees)*12 |
| Information Security | ||||||||
| Number of attendees of information security training course (persons) |
● | ● | ● | 37,670 | 37,272 | 35,967 | 35,504★ | 35,374 |
| Rate of targeted threat emails for simulation trainings opened |
● | ● | ● | 6.0% | 7.1% | 12.0% | 11.0%★ | 7.4% |
| Number of sites which obtained third-party certifications for information security |
● | ● | ISMS: 20 departments Privacy mark: 12 group companies |
ISMS: 18 departments Privacy mark: 12 group companies |
ISMS: 17 departments Privacy mark: 9 group companies |
ISMS: 19 departments Privacy mark: 9 group companies |
ISMS: 21 departments Privacy mark: 9 group companies |
|
| Number of departments which conducted information security audit |
● | ● | 717 | 727 | 719 | 701 | 730 | |
| Intellectual Properties | ||||||||
| Number of patent applications | ● | ● | ● | 37 | 30 | 26 | 28★ | 45 |
| Number of patents held | ● | ● | ● | 102 | 111 | 138 | 171 | 207 |
- *1Figures for FY2022 are as of February 28, 2023
- *2As the Company was a Company with a Nominating Committee, etc. until February 28, 2023, figures for FY2022 indicate the number of executive officers. Figures for FY2022 are as of February 28, 2023. *10 Includes the number of e-learning training sessions implemented for all Japan and overseas group employees: Inside ( )
- *3Includes the number of e-learning training sessions implemented for all Japan and overseas group employees: Inside ( )
- *4Implemented online initial response training at 16 group companies
- *5Implemented online tabletop training exercises. Figures in parentheses ( ) indicate the number of group companies conducting the training
- *6 Implemented training at LOGISTEED head office for members of the LOGISTEED head office disaster response HQ
- *7Conducted at each group company's head office. Figures in parentheses ( ) indicate the number of Group companies conducting the training
- *8 Implemented online and at the LOGISTEED West Japan head office for members of the LOGISTEED head office disaster response HQ and the West Japan disaster response HQ, the designated alternative site in the event of a disaster affecting head office
- *9Delayed due to impacts stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic
- *10LOGISTEED China, Ltd., LOGISTEED Taiwan, Ltd., PT LOGISTEED Indonesia Forwarding, PT LOGISTEED Indonesia, PT VANTEC INDOMOBIL LOGISTICS, LOGISTEED INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
- *11LOGISTEED China, Ltd., LOGISTEED Malaysia Sdn. Bhd., LOGISTEED (Thailand), Ltd., LOGISTEED CONTRACT LOGISTICS (THAILAND) PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED, PT LOGISTEED Indonesia Forwarding, PT LOGISTEED Indonesia, PT VANTEC INDOMOBIL LOGISTICS
- *12PT LOGISTEED Indonesia Forwarding, PT LOGISTEED Indonesia, PT VANTEC INDOMOBIL LOGISTICS, LOGISTEED China, Ltd., MARS LOGISTEED GROUP LOJISTIK ANONIM SIRKETI, LOGISTEED INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
- ★Figures do not include the ALPS LOGISTICS Group